Tonga Independent News

Opinion: Tonga’s Governance Crisis: Demanding Transparency and Accountability

Recent revelations surrounding the sale of shares in Lulutai Airlines have once again thrust Tonga’s governance into the spotlight. The sale, conducted in August 2023, has ignited concerns amongst MP’s regarding accountability and transparency within the highest echelons of power.
At the crux of this controversy lies Prime Minister Hu’akavameiliku’s dual roles as Chairman of Lulutai Airlines Ltd Board and chairman of Tonga’s Retirement Fund Board who acquired the shares. This dual responsibility has raised legitimate questions about potential conflicts of interest and whether decisions were made in the best interests of the people.
The lack of transparency surrounding the sale, including the absence of vital information such as the sale price and methodology, has only deepened suspicions and reinforced calls for accountability. Despite pleas from MP’s for a financial report from Lulutai, the government has failed to provide satisfactory explanations, leaving citizens and independent MPs rightfully questioning the integrity of the process.
Additionally, the concentration of power in the hands of a select few, exacerbated by the Prime Minister’s extensive portfolio spanning key ministries and chairmanships of various boards, only serves to intensify concerns about conflicts of interest and accountability.
In response to mounting pressure, Parliament has established a committee to investigate Lulutai Airlines’ operations and governance.
When questioned about specific actions taken by the Prime Minister to address this conflict, a senior independent MP revealed a concerning lack of accountability. Despite numerous inquiries and even a Vote of No Confidence (VONC), the Prime Minister has failed to address the conflict adequately. Instead, “he has been trying to justify holding on to those positions and Lulutai Airline’s operations from parliamentary scrutiny by not including the business under the Public Enterise Act.” Said the MP.
The decision to register Lulutai as a public company, despite its operational characteristics more closely aligning with those of a private entity, raises suspicions of intentional obfuscation. By utilizing the Company Act to shield operational details, the Prime Minister effectively sidesteps accountability to Parliament and the public.
Additionally, the potential for bias in overseeing the Retirement Fund while chairing Lulutai Airlines remains a significant concern. Decisions about the Fund’s involvement with Lulutai may have been influenced by the Prime Minister’s connections, with investments in a struggling company lacking independent scrutiny.
What’s equally alarming is the lack of public outcry regarding these conflicts of interest. Despite the implications for good governance and transparency, members of the cabinet seem complacent, prioritizing personal interests over national integrity. Even in the face of a VONC and subsequent legal challenges, the Prime Minister retains unwavering support from his colleagues, highlighting systemic flaws in Tonga’s parliamentary processes.
To restore public trust and confidence in the government, decisive action must be taken. It is imperative to separate roles and establish clear guidelines to prevent conflicts of interest. Moreover, government officials must commit to upholding principles of transparency and accountability in all their dealings, particularly when public funds and assets are involved.
The ongoing controversy surrounding Lulutai Airlines serves as a poignant reminder for Tonga’s leadership to prioritize the interests of the people above all else. The public deserves transparency and assurance that their government is acting in their best interests.
As this saga unfolds, it is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and demand accountability from their elected representatives. Only through open dialogue, rigorous accountability measures, and a steadfast commitment to ethical governance can Tonga hope to overcome this crisis and pave the way for a brighter future.
The sale of shares in Lulutai Airlines is not just a transaction; it’s a test of Tonga’s commitment to democracy, transparency, and the rule of law. The people deserve answers, and it’s time for the government to deliver.
History of Lulutai and Previous Government-Owned Airlines
To understand the gravity of the current situation, it’s essential to delve into the history of Lulutai Airlines and previous government-owned airlines in Tonga. Lulutai Airlines emerged as a quasi-non-governmental organization (NGO), effectively functioning as an extension of the government. However, its status as a government-backed entity deterred private investors from engaging in investment evaluations due to concerns about its commercial viability.

During a session of the Legislative Assembly in 2022, the Government of Tonga (GOT) disclosed that Lulutai had accumulated expenses amounting to T$18 million. This significant loss within approximately two years of its establishment as a monopoly operator indicates clear signs of not adhering to standard commercial practices. Despite its status as a quasi-NGO, private investors refrained from engaging in investment evaluations due to Lulutai’s effectively government department.
Reflecting on history, the dissolution of Royal Tongan Airlines in the early 2000s revealed liabilities of T$13 million on its balance sheet. Two decades later, a similar narrative unfolds, with the current government persisting in sustaining a financially unsustainable venture. This involves diverting retirement funds to support an airline business for which they lack the requisite expertise. The duration for which this practice can be sustained remains uncertain.
Ethical Breach and Accountability
The Prime Minister Siaosi Sovaleni’s blatant conflict of interest in simultaneously chairing Lulutai Airlines and the retirement funds represents a grave ethical breach. Such actions undermine the principles of transparency, accountability, and good governance, posing a threat to democratic norms and the well-being of the people of Tonga.
Questions must be asked of Retirement Fund management regarding the advice they gave to the board regarding the loan. Did they have access to Lulutai’s financial position? What was their final recommendation? Did any board members question the Lulutai loan?
These questions are critical for ensuring transparency, accountability, and responsible governance in this situation:
Advice from Retirement Fund Management: Inquire about the advice provided by the Retirement Fund management to the board regarding the decision to extend a loan to Lulutai Airlines. Specifically, what information did they have regarding Lulutai’s financial position, and how did they assess the risks associated with the loan?
Examination of Lulutai’s Financial Position: Understand whether Retirement Fund management had access to accurate and comprehensive information about Lulutai Airlines’ financial health. Did they conduct a thorough analysis of the company’s financial statements, cash flow, and profitability?
Final Recommendation: Determine the final recommendation provided by Retirement Fund management to the board regarding the proposed loan to Lulutai Airlines. Did they advise for or against the loan, and what were the reasons behind their recommendation?
Board Member Inquiries: Ascertain whether any board members questioned the decision to extend a loan to Lulutai Airlines during board meetings. Did any members express concerns about potential conflicts of interest or the financial viability of the loan?
These questions are critical for holding both the Retirement Fund management and the board of directors, including the Prime Minister, accountable for their actions and ensuring that decisions are made in the best interests of Tongan citizens rather than personal gain or corporate interests. Transparency and thorough scrutiny are essential safeguards against corruption, ethical breaches, and the erosion of democratic norms.
In conclusion, the Prime Minister’s actions regarding the sale of shares in Lulutai Airlines should be subject to thorough scrutiny and accountability. The public has a right to know the details of such transactions and to ensure that government officials are acting in the best interests of the country, rather than their own personal gain.