Editorial | After the Vote: Cabinet Formation and the Balance of Power
The election of Lord Fakafanua as Prime Minister has immediately shifted attention from the vote itself to the structure of the government that will now follow. With the People’s Representatives divided, the Nobles were able to exercise decisive influence in the parliamentary ballot, a dynamic that is now shaping expectations around the composition of the incoming Cabinet.
Political observers are closely watching whether Lord Fakafanua will allocate ministerial portfolios across the remaining Nobles’ bloc. Under Tonga’s constitutional arrangements, the Ministry of Lands is reserved for a Noble and will be filled accordingly. Beyond that requirement, however, the Prime Minister retains discretion in forming his Cabinet, creating the possibility that Nobles could occupy a majority of ministerial positions.
Such an outcome would be unprecedented in Tonga’s modern political history. Since the democratic reforms that rebalanced executive authority and expanded the role of elected People’s Representatives, Cabinets have been structured to reflect a broad sharing of power between the two groups. A Cabinet dominated by Nobles would represent a departure from that pattern and would raise important questions about how executive authority is exercised within the current constitutional framework.
For proponents of the democratic movement, this moment carries particular significance. The reforms were designed to limit the concentration of power and to strengthen representative governance. While the Constitution continues to recognise a formal role for the Nobility, the expectation was that political leadership would increasingly rest with the People’s Representatives. The present parliamentary arithmetic, however, has produced a different outcome, driven not by constitutional change but by political alignment.
At the same time, supporters of the existing system point out that the process has unfolded entirely within the rules of Tonga’s Constitution. The Prime Minister was elected by Parliament, the Nobles acted within their prescribed voting rights, and the formation of Cabinet remains a lawful exercise of executive discretion. From this perspective, the current situation reflects political reality rather than institutional failure.
The coming days will therefore be critical. The composition of Lord Fakafanua’s Cabinet will not only determine the direction of policy and governance, but also signal how power is likely to be balanced between elected representatives and the Nobility over the next parliamentary term. In that sense, the Cabinet appointments may prove as consequential as the Prime Ministerial vote itself, shaping both public confidence and the future trajectory of Tonga’s democratic development.

