Angel Investing, Venture Capital, and Rethinking Tonga’s Development Paradigm
 
											Op-ed Tevita Motulalo
MSc Geopolitics and International Relations
Tonga’s financial and development systems remain anchored in conservative and often outdated models of credit and state intervention. The country’s growth narrative has for too long revolved around supporting “old and legacy” sectors—agriculture, fisheries, and tourism—through collateral-heavy loans and bureaucratic programs. While these areas are important, this approach limits innovation, concentrates market power, and perpetuates dependence on slow-yielding industries. A strategic shift is needed: from collateral-based, bureaucracy-driven finance to confidence-based, innovation-led growth.
Angel investing and venture capital (VC) represent that shift. They prioritize ideas, leadership, and scalability over physical collateral. Angel investors—often local or diaspora professionals—provide seed funding to startups in exchange for small equity stakes or convertible instruments, while offering mentorship and networks. Venture capital funds build on this, investing larger sums once market traction is proven, earning returns through company growth rather than fixed interest. Together, they build ecosystems that reward initiative, experimentation, and entrepreneurship.
The National Reserve Bank of Tonga (NRBT) took a promising step in June 2025 with its FinTech Regulatory Sandbox Framework, launched with the Alliance for Financial Inclusion (AFI). The sandbox allows innovators to test digital payment, remittance, and financial inclusion solutions within a controlled regulatory environment. It signals an openness to experimentation and technology-driven finance—a direction Tonga urgently needs.
However, for this initiative to achieve its potential, greater coordination is required between the NRBT’s sandbox and the Government Development Loan (GDL) Facility operated through the Tonga Development Bank. The GDL currently channels concessional loans into traditional sectors. Instead, a portion of that capital should be reallocated to seed new, high-impact ventures emerging from the sandbox and other innovation pipelines. These funds should take the form of equity or revenue-sharing instruments, not traditional debt, to ensure startups have breathing room to grow.
At the same time, the government must reconsider its development paradigm. It should ease off the endless injection of resources into state-owned enterprises and entrenched oligopolies in communications, finance, and utilities—entities that dominate the economy but deliver limited innovation or productivity gains. Bureaucratic interference in markets has stifled private initiative. Public capital should instead be strategically injected into new, locally founded ventures capable of building Tonga’s next generation of industries. These companies—if properly supported—can drive export value, digital capacity, and job creation far more effectively than legacy enterprises.
Transparency is also essential. The NRBT’s sandbox operations should be publicly transparent in its schedules, participants, and outcomes to ensure genuine private sector access rather than quiet capture by existing institutions or state entities.
As His Majesty rightfully warned time and again: Government agencies should refrain from competing with, or crowding out, the private sector, nor prioritize short-term revenue for the state at the expense of market dynamism. And the distribution of those resources should be fair and uncorrupted.
To safeguard integrity and coordination, Tonga should establish an Independent Innovation and Investment Commission to oversee a National Incubator for Startups and High-Impact Enterprises. This body—comprising representatives from finance, technology, academia, and development partners—would vet ventures, mobilize blended finance, and ensure accountability and transparency across both public and private funding streams.
Ultimately, the transition to angel and venture capital investing is not just financial—it is philosophical. It signals Tonga’s readiness to invest in creativity over collateral, enterprise over bureaucracy, and the future over the familiar. In doing so, Tonga can chart a new development path—one powered not by dependence, but by innovation, talent, and vision.
In essence, the next national Strategic Development Framework (which governs government priority and budgeting) should only have this priority: the strategic objective diversification and deployment of finance to create an innovative free market ecosystem that is lively, full of creativity, and willing to grow. The rest of the donor priorities (inclusivity, gender, environment, etc), will be made a feature of that system, not separate goals in themselves that obstruct its own development.

 
								

